The honest rent vs buy trade-off.

Buying isn't always smarter. Compare total cost over your actual time horizon, including opportunity cost on the down payment.

Verdict
Buying wins by $48,200
Break-even: year 4
Net cost — buying$240,000
Net cost — renting$288,200
Equity at sale$182,000
Investment value (rent path)$144,000
The honest math

Comparing two ten-year balance sheets.

The right framing isn't "monthly mortgage vs monthly rent" — that comparison is rigged toward buying because it ignores the down payment, closing costs, maintenance, property tax, and the opportunity cost of capital tied up in equity. The right framing is: after N years, what's my net wealth in each scenario?

Buying net cost = (mortgage + tax + ins + maint) × yrs + closing − equity at sale
Renting net cost = sum of rents (growing) − investment growth on (down payment + closing)
  • Equity at sale = home value × (1 + appreciation)yrs − loan balance − selling costs.
  • Investment growth = the alternative use of the down payment + buyer closing costs invested at the assumed return.
The dominant lever: time horizon

Closing costs (~3–5% to buy, ~6–8% to sell) eat the equity gain on short horizons. Don't buy if you might move within 5 years unless local appreciation is unusually high and reliable. After 7–10 years buying usually wins; before 5 years renting usually wins.

Worked example

Sam, 7-year horizon, $450k home vs $2,400 rent.

Scenario · 2026

Buying wins by ~$48k — but only if all assumptions hold.

Setup. Home $450k, 20% down ($90k), 6.5% mortgage rate, 3.5% annual home appreciation, 1% property tax, 1% maintenance. Rent $2,400/mo growing 3.5%/yr. Down payment alternative: invested at 7%.
Buy side over 7 years. Mortgage payment $2,275/mo + tax $375 + ins $130 + maint $375 = $3,155/mo cash outflow. Closing costs in $13,500. Home value at year 7 ≈ $573,000. Loan balance ≈ $327,000. Equity after 6% selling cost = $211,500. Net buying cost: ~$240,000.
Rent side over 7 years. Total rent paid (growing 3.5%/yr) ≈ $228,500. Down + closing ($103,500) invested at 7% grows to $166,200 — that's $62,700 of investment growth. Net rent cost: ~$288,000.
Verdict. Buying wins by ~$48,000 over 7 years.
Sensitivity: lower appreciation to 2% and renting wins by $5k. Lower the investment return to 4% and buying wins by $80k.
Quick rules

Three heuristics, in order of usefulness.

RuleThe mathWhen it tells the truth
5% ruleAnnual unrecoverable cost ≈ 5% of home valueBest general-purpose check; built on real ownership economics
Price-to-Rent ratioHome price ÷ annual rent. <15 buy, >20 rent, 15–20 toss-upUseful for relative comparison across cities
5-year ruleDon't buy if you might move within 5 yearsAlways. Closing costs make it nearly impossible to win on short horizons

All three favor renting more often than the typical buy-side calculator suggests, because they take ownership's hidden costs at face value.

Common mistakes

How rent-vs-buy math goes wrong.

Skipping or low-balling maintenance

1–2% of home value per year is realistic over a long enough horizon (Joint Center for Housing Studies / Harvard). Calculators that use 0.5% or zero are biased toward buying.

Comparing mortgage payment to rent

The mortgage payment is the start, not the total. Add property tax, insurance, HOA, and maintenance and you're typically 30–50% above the headline payment. That's the right number to compare to rent.

Forgetting opportunity cost

The down payment isn't free. Invested at 7% over 10 years, $80k becomes $157k. Buying-side calculators that don't credit the rent path with equivalent investment growth quietly tilt the comparison.

Methodology

What's behind the calculation.

Assumptions
  • Mortgage uses 30-year amortization at the user-supplied rate. Loan balance computed by amortizing each month over the horizon.
  • Default property tax: 1.2% of home value per year. Insurance: 0.35%. Maintenance: 1.0%. Closing costs to buy: 3% of price. Closing costs to sell: 6% of price at sale (grown with appreciation).
  • Tax deductibility (mortgage interest, SALT) is not modeled — most households take the standard deduction post-TCJA, and modeling deductibility would arbitrarily favor buying for filers who don't actually itemize.
  • Investment growth on the rent path: down payment + buyer closing costs compound at the user-supplied investment-return rate.
  • Rent grows at the user-supplied annual rate; home value grows at the user-supplied appreciation rate.
  • The model intentionally uses real-dollar comparisons (no inflation indexing) since the inputs are nominal.

Sources: Joint Center for Housing Studies (Harvard) "State of the Nation's Housing"; Robert Shiller historical home-price index; NYT "Is it better to rent or buy?" (Bary/Manjoo/Quealy framework); CFPB Loan Estimate disclosures; Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances.

Glossary

Vocabulary of the rent-vs-buy decision.

Price-to-Rent ratio
Home price ÷ annual rent for a comparable property. The single most quoted heuristic.
Unrecoverable cost
Money you spend on ownership that doesn't build equity: interest, property tax, maintenance, insurance, HOA. The "5% rule" estimates this annually.
PITI
Principal + Interest + property Taxes + Insurance. The four-part monthly cost of homeownership ex-maintenance.
Imputed rent
The implicit rent you'd pay yourself as a homeowner. Tax-free under US law; an underrated benefit of ownership.
Buyer closing costs
Origination, appraisal, title, inspection, prepaid escrow. ~3–5% of price.
Seller closing costs
Agent commissions (~5–6%), transfer tax, concessions, prep. ~6–8% of sale price.
Capital gains exclusion
Up to $250,000 single / $500,000 MFJ of home-sale gain is tax-free if you've lived in the home 2 of the last 5 years (IRC §121).
Opportunity cost
The return your down payment would have earned in alternative investments. Critical for the rent-side comparison.
Real return
Nominal return minus inflation. Long-term US home prices have appreciated ~1% real (per Shiller).
Related

Tools that pair with this one.

FAQ

Questions, asked plainly.

The Price-to-Rent ratio: home price ÷ annual rent. Below 15 strongly favors buying. Above 20 strongly favors renting. 15–20 is the gray zone where personal factors decide. As of late 2025, the national US median P/R sits around 19 — clustered near the buy/rent boundary, with wide regional variation (San Jose & Honolulu near 30; Cleveland & Pittsburgh near 12).

Popularized by Ben Felix and Ramit Sethi: estimate annual unrecoverable cost of ownership at ~5% of home value (about 1% property tax + 1% maintenance + 3% mortgage-interest cost net of equity build). If your annual rent is below 5% of the equivalent home's price, renting is the economically rational default. Above 5%, buying tends to win on long horizons. The advantage of the 5% framing: it makes ownership's hidden costs visible at a glance.

Yes — and most rent-vs-buy calculators understate it. Realistic long-term average is 1–2% of home value per year. Per the Joint Center for Housing Studies (Harvard), median annual maintenance for owner-occupied US homes is ~1.5% of home value. Skipping or low-balling this line is the #1 way buy-vs-rent calculators bias the answer toward buying.

Renting has real, quantifiable option value. If a career change, family change, or city change might happen in 3–5 years, that optionality is worth roughly $20,000–$40,000 — closing costs (5–10% combined to buy + sell) eat the equity gain on short horizons. Conversely, owners gain stability — locked-in payment for 30 years vs annual rent increases — which is its own option value.

It's the dominant variable. Closing costs to buy run ~3–5% of the home; selling costs (agent commissions + transfer tax + concessions) run ~6–8%. Combined, you need 9–13% of home appreciation just to break even on transaction costs. At 3% annual appreciation, that takes ~3–4 years; at flat prices, it never breaks even. Honest threshold: don't buy if you might move in under 5 years, period.

For most households, no — and the calculator above ignores it for that reason. Post-TCJA standard deductions ($15k single, $30k MFJ in 2026) mean only ~10% of US filers itemize. The Joint Committee on Taxation found the median MID benefit accrues to households earning $200k+. For everyone else, treat MID as zero.

Long-term US home prices have averaged roughly inflation + 1% real (Robert Shiller, 1890–2024). The 2010s and early 2020s ran well above that on cheap money and supply constraints. Honest planning assumption: 3–4% nominal annual appreciation. Using 6%+ extrapolates an unusual decade and biases the calculator toward buying. Local markets vary materially.

This is the silent factor that flips many buy-vs-rent decisions. A $80,000 down payment invested in broad equities at 7% nominal grows to ~$157,000 in 10 years. The calculator credits that opportunity cost on the rent side — without it, the buy side looks artificially better. Choose your assumed return carefully: 7% is the long-run S&P average; 4% is conservative; 10% is optimistic.

In rough order of forgotten size: (1) closing costs to buy (~3–5% of price), (2) closing costs to sell (~6–8%), (3) ongoing maintenance (1–2%/yr), (4) property tax (0.5% in HI to 2.5% in NJ), (5) homeowner's insurance ($1,000–$3,000/yr), (6) HOA dues (often $300–$800/mo on condos), (7) PMI under 20% down, (8) higher utility bills.

No — and this is important. The calculator is the right starting point, not the final word. It can't model: how much you actually like the home, neighborhood, schools; whether you'll do DIY maintenance or hire it out; whether being house-rich and cash-poor would stress your marriage; whether the locked-in payment vs annual rent increases is worth a premium for your peace of mind. Use the calculator to bound the financial dimension. Make the decision on the full picture.